Ribbens McCarthy, Jane; Hooper, Carol-Ann and Gillies, Val
|Google Scholar:||Look up in Google Scholar|
In this opening chapter, we set out some of the underlying assumptions and tensions behind our 'family troubles' project. While we continue to draw on the language of troubles from which our project started, we are very aware of the developing political associations, even as we seek to carve out a particular space for careful reflection and critical engagement. The goal of our project on family troubles is not to ‘other’ the troubled however defined, but to invite debate and to explore how the normal and the troubling are perceived, experienced, and presented by different actors in different contexts, whose definition of trouble prevails in particular contexts, where responsibility is located for particular troubles, with what consequences and so on.
In this opening chapter, we set out some of the debates invoked by these contentious and complex issues, and begin to consider what theoretical and conceptual frameworks are available to help us to think about these questions.
|Item Type:||Book Chapter|
|Copyright Holders:||2013 The Authors|
|Keywords:||family policy, family troubles, children, young people, childcare|
|Academic Unit/School:||Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences (FASS) > History, Religious Studies, Sociology, Social Policy and Criminology
Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences (FASS)
|Interdisciplinary Research Centre:||Centre for Citizenship, Identities and Governance (CCIG)|
|Depositing User:||Jane Ribbens McCarthy|
|Date Deposited:||06 Nov 2012 09:11|
|Last Modified:||22 Mar 2017 17:08|
|Share this page:|