Storey, John and Grint, Keith
This is the latest version of this eprint.
Due to copyright restrictions, this file is not available for public download
Click here to request a copy from the OU Author.
|DOI (Digital Object Identifier) Link:||https://doi.org/10.1108/17511871211268900|
|Google Scholar:||Look up in Google Scholar|
The purpose of this article is to delve into the precise 'leadership' and 'governance' roles required of General Practitioners in England as they are propelled into new Clinical Commissioning Groups.
A conceptual framework which captures the complementary essences of both leadership and governance is developed and then used to assess the extent to which GPs will be undertaking leadership and/or governance roles within the commissioning groups.
|Item Type:||Journal Article|
|Copyright Holders:||2012 Emerald Group Publishing Limited|
|Project Funding Details:||
|Keywords:||commissioning; GP leadership; governance; scapegoat; legitimation|
|Academic Unit/Department:||Faculty of Business and Law (FBL) > Business
Faculty of Business and Law (FBL)
|Interdisciplinary Research Centre:||Innovation, Knowledge & Development research centre (IKD)|
|Depositing User:||John Storey|
|Date Deposited:||11 Oct 2012 09:38|
|Last Modified:||08 Oct 2016 07:27|
|Share this page:|
Available Versions of this Item
- Will GPs “lead” or “govern” the new Clinical Commissioning Groups? (deposited 11 Oct 2012 09:38) [Currently Displayed]