Copy the page URI to the clipboard
Briggs, Gemma; Hole, Graham and Land, Michael
(2011).
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2011.02.004
Abstract
It is now well established that driving performance deteriorates during a mobile phone conversation, but the precise conditions under which interference occurs warrant further research. The present study examined the effects of varying the participants’ level of emotional involvement in the conversation, while keeping the conversation similar in content for all participants. Twenty-six participants, half of whom were spider-phobics, completed a simulated driving task, either while undistracted or while conversing on the subject of spiders. The individuals who were spider-phobic, and hence more emotionally involved in the conversation, demonstrated significantly higher cognitive workload (as indexed by heart rate), made more driving errors, and demonstrated a significant decline in the range of their visual fixations, showing a pattern of visual tunnelling. The type of conversation engaged in has a significant effect on driver performance: the more emotionally involving the conversation, the greater its potential for distraction.
Viewing alternatives
Download history
Metrics
Public Attention
Altmetrics from AltmetricNumber of Citations
Citations from DimensionsItem Actions
Export
About
- Item ORO ID
- 34457
- Item Type
- Journal Item
- ISSN
- 1369-8478
- Keywords
- attention; perception; dual tasking; cognitive workload; driving; anxiety
- Academic Unit or School
-
Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences (FASS) > Psychology and Counselling > Psychology
Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences (FASS) > Psychology and Counselling
Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences (FASS) - Research Group
-
Harm and Evidence Research Collaborative (HERC)
Forensic Cognition Research Group (FCRG) - Copyright Holders
- © 2011 Elsevier Ltd
- Related URLs
- Depositing User
- Gemma Briggs