PDF (Version of Record)
- Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
Download (147Kb) | Preview
|Google Scholar:||Look up in Google Scholar|
The ‘harem’ was been a powerful image in the minds of westerners for centuries, and appears as a conceptual tool in nineteenth-century texts discussing the social history of classical Athens. Trying to uncover the reality of Athenian women’s lives, classicists refer to the Athenian woman’s home as more or less like a harem, and more or less ‘modern’ and ‘Christian.’ In this paper, I analyse the use of harem imagery in handbooks on Greek social history written in the Victorian period, using recent feminist and postcolonial theory to investigate the texts. I argue that terms such as ‘oriental’ and the image of the oriental harem were used by classicists in two main ways: either to draw attention to the oppressiveness of Athenians who had houses akin to harems, or to describe the extremes of misogyny of which Athenians could not be accused. The authors utilise an ‘index of female oppression’ with the oriental harem standing in for the most extreme oppression, while the modern Christian woman appears as the most liberated. The Athenians are placed between these two poles on the continuum. Finally, I note that in this discourse, similarities between modern home, oriental harem and Athenian gunaikonitis are revealed implicitly, with their commonalties allowing for the comparison.
|Item Type:||Journal Article|
|Copyright Holders:||2011 Joanna Brown|
|Academic Unit/Department:||Arts > Classical Studies
|Depositing User:||Jo Brown|
|Date Deposited:||03 Oct 2012 13:27|
|Last Modified:||25 Feb 2016 03:15|
|Share this page:|
Download history for this item
These details should be considered as only a guide to the number of downloads performed manually. Algorithmic methods have been applied in an attempt to remove automated downloads from the displayed statistics but no guarantee can be made as to the accuracy of the figures.