Alexander-Passe, Neil and Zimmer, Bob
PDF (Version of Record)
- Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
Download (305Kb) | Preview
|Google Scholar:||Look up in Google Scholar|
The Coping Inventory for Stressful Situations (CISS) (Endler & Parker, 1999) identifies three main behaviors in response to stress – trying hard to perform, blaming oneself or others for one’s failure, and avoiding exposure altogether.
It has been shown that, amongst pupils with dyslexia, these three behaviors are associated with different genders (Alexander-Passe, 2004a, 2006, in press) and different levels of self-esteem and depression (Alexander-Passe, 2004a, 2006) – in particular:
• Trying hard to perform – mainly males, gaining academic self-esteem from teacher approval
• Avoiding exposure – mainly females, shielding overall self-esteem
• Blaming – mainly females, losing personal self-esteem and showing depression.
As it happens, these three behaviors are opposites to the three that make up the simplest possible, basic learning dialogue (Zimmer, 2001; Zimmer & Chapman, 2004; Zimmer, 2008):
• Listening receptively rather than blaming, so as to invite thinking
• Showing comprehension rather than just trying hard, so as to invite listening in return, and
• Sharing one’s own thinking rather than avoiding exposure, so as to invite comprehension.
Evidence from the dyslexia literature shows that the three CISS behaviors are common amongst pupils with dyslexia, indicating that dyslexic pupils are often disengaged from the basic learning dialogue.
|Item Type:||Book Chapter|
|Keywords:||Dyslexia; learning; dialogue; educational psychology; cognition; individual differences; motivation|
|Academic Unit/Department:||Institute of Educational Technology|
|Interdisciplinary Research Centre:||Centre for Research in Education and Educational Technology (CREET)|
|Depositing User:||Bob Zimmer|
|Date Deposited:||23 Aug 2012 10:23|
|Last Modified:||20 Aug 2016 12:32|
|Share this page:|
Download history for this item
These details should be considered as only a guide to the number of downloads performed manually. Algorithmic methods have been applied in an attempt to remove automated downloads from the displayed statistics but no guarantee can be made as to the accuracy of the figures.