The Open UniversitySkip to content
 

OULDI-JISC Project Evaluation Report: the impact of new curriulum design tools and approaches on institutional process and design cultures

Cross, Simon; Galley, Rebecca; Brasher, Andrew and Weller, Martin (2012). OULDI-JISC Project Evaluation Report: the impact of new curriulum design tools and approaches on institutional process and design cultures. OULDI Project (Open University).

Full text available as:
[img]
Preview
PDF (Version of Record) - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
Download (2410Kb)
Google Scholar: Look up in Google Scholar

Abstract

This report presents research and evaluation undertaken by the OULDI-JISC Project (Open University Learning Design Initiative JISC Project) between 2008 and 2012. In particular, it considers the impact of new curriculum design tools and approaches piloted by the project on institutional processes and design cultures. These tools and approaches include tools for sharing learning design expertise (Cloudworks), visualising designs (CompendiumLD, Module Map, Activity Profile) and for supporting design and reflection in workshops (Facilitation Cards, workshop activities, etc.). The project has adopted a learning design approach so as to help foreground pedagogy and learner experience. Nine pilots have been completed across six UK universities.

Item Type: Other
Copyright Holders: 2012 JISC / OULDI Project
Project Funding Details:
Funded Project NameProject IDFunding Body
Not SetNot SetJISC
Keywords: curriculum design; learning design; Cloudworks; CompendiumLD
Academic Unit/Department: Institute of Educational Technology
Other Departments > Learning and Teaching Solutions
Other Departments
Interdisciplinary Research Centre: Centre for Research in Education and Educational Technology (CREET)
Item ID: 34140
Depositing User: Simon Cross
Date Deposited: 06 Aug 2012 09:54
Last Modified: 02 Aug 2016 21:29
URI: http://oro.open.ac.uk/id/eprint/34140
Share this page:

Download history for this item

These details should be considered as only a guide to the number of downloads performed manually. Algorithmic methods have been applied in an attempt to remove automated downloads from the displayed statistics but no guarantee can be made as to the accuracy of the figures.

▼ Automated document suggestions from open access sources

Actions (login may be required)

Policies | Disclaimer

© The Open University   + 44 (0)870 333 4340   general-enquiries@open.ac.uk