The Open UniversitySkip to content

Visualizing consensus with online ontologies to support quality in ontology development

d'Aquin, Mathieu and Motta, Enrico (2010). Visualizing consensus with online ontologies to support quality in ontology development. In: EKAW 2010 Workshop on Ontology Quality, 15 Oct 2010, Lisbon, Portugal.

Full text available as:
PDF (Version of Record) - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
Download (1MB)
Google Scholar: Look up in Google Scholar


Representing a consensus is one of the most important of the qualities of an ontology. Generally, consensus is understood in ontology engineering as an accurate representation of a shared view or model within an ontology. However, we can also show that, while developing an ontology, checking for the agreement of other existing ontologies that have been published online can be very valuable. Indeed, relying on the Watson Semantic Web search engine and on existing measures of agreement, consensus and controversy in ontologies, we develop a visualization method that allows to emphasize `areas' of an ontology which are in disagreement with online ontologies, as well as elements touching on controversial statements, for which a clear consensus has not been established. Integrating this visualization into the ontology development environment allows for the ontology engineer to quickly identify elements of the ontology which quality might need to be improved, as they relate to such generally disagreed or controversial areas.

Item Type: Conference or Workshop Item
Copyright Holders: Not known
Academic Unit/School: Faculty of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) > Knowledge Media Institute (KMi)
Faculty of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM)
Research Group: Centre for Research in Computing (CRC)
Related URLs:
Item ID: 33414
Depositing User: Kay Dave
Date Deposited: 17 Apr 2012 15:32
Last Modified: 10 May 2019 21:44
Share this page:

Download history for this item

These details should be considered as only a guide to the number of downloads performed manually. Algorithmic methods have been applied in an attempt to remove automated downloads from the displayed statistics but no guarantee can be made as to the accuracy of the figures.

Actions (login may be required)

Policies | Disclaimer

© The Open University   contact the OU