De Liddo, Anna; Buckingham Shum, Simon; McAndrew, Patrick and Farrow, Robert
(2012).
![]()
|
PDF (Version of Record)
- Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
Download (1MB) |
URL: | http://www.ucel.ac.uk/oer12/abstracts/322.html |
---|---|
Google Scholar: | Look up in Google Scholar |
Abstract
This paper considers a Collective Intelligence approach to collating the evidence needed to support policy in open education. A tool, called the OER Evidence Hub, provides an infrastructure for the OER community to collect examples and data of OER effectiveness and use and then supports the community and others such as policy makers with a community generated knowledge base to help decision making. We describe the Evidence Hub concept and features, present figures on user engagement, and discuss the results of initial user testing. We also show through examples how content can be seeded into the OER Evidence Hub, and illustrate the way in which it has captured exemplars identified by a particular community, the OER Advocacy group. Finally we discuss general issues and future strategies for building effective Collective Intelligence platforms for Open Education and other purposes.
Item Type: | Conference or Workshop Item |
---|---|
Copyright Holders: | 2012 The Authors |
Academic Unit/School: | Faculty of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) > Knowledge Media Institute (KMi) Faculty of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) Learning and Teaching Innovation (LTI) > Institute of Educational Technology (IET) Learning and Teaching Innovation (LTI) |
Research Group: | Centre for Research in Computing (CRC) Centre for Research in Education and Educational Technology (CREET) |
Related URLs: | |
Item ID: | 33253 |
Depositing User: | Kay Dave |
Date Deposited: | 23 Mar 2012 10:06 |
Last Modified: | 08 Dec 2018 22:07 |
URI: | http://oro.open.ac.uk/id/eprint/33253 |
Share this page: | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download history for this item
These details should be considered as only a guide to the number of downloads performed manually. Algorithmic methods have been applied in an attempt to remove automated downloads from the displayed statistics but no guarantee can be made as to the accuracy of the figures.