Copy the page URI to the clipboard
Corry, Olaf
(2010).
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-5707-8_2
Abstract
According to some, the third sector is unsuited to singular definitions because it is by its nature unruly. However, different definitions or theorizations can be identified. Ontologically oriented definitions of the third sector offer differing views on what it is made up of and what is excluded. Thus, an “American” view defines it as a separate sector characterized by organized, private, nonprofit, and voluntary entities. A “European” definition sees it as a hybrid phenomenon combining and connecting other sectors such as state and market (this allows social enterprises and [welfare] state bodies in). In contrast, epistemologically oriented theorizations treat the third sector more as a process or form of practice: a particular type of communication (following systems theory), a form of ordering and governing of people (following discourse theory), or a form of struggle or dialogue between social forces (following critical theory).
Viewing alternatives
Metrics
Public Attention
Altmetrics from AltmetricNumber of Citations
Citations from Dimensions- Published Version (PDF) This file is not available for public download
Item Actions
Export
About
- Item ORO ID
- 32938
- Item Type
- Book Section
- ISBN
- 1-4419-5706-5, 978-1-4419-5706-1
- Academic Unit or School
- Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences (FASS)
- Copyright Holders
- © 2010 Springer Science + Media, LLC
- Related URLs
- Depositing User
- Olaf Corry