The Open UniversitySkip to content
 

Can a normal range of elbow movement predict a normalelbow x ray?

Lennon, Robert; Riyat, Manjeet S.; Hilliam, Rachel; Anathkrishnan, G. and Alderson, Gerry (2007). Can a normal range of elbow movement predict a normalelbow x ray? Emergency Medicine Journal, 24(2) pp. 86–88.

Full text available as:
Full text not publicly available
Due to copyright restrictions, this file is not available for public download
DOI (Digital Object Identifier) Link: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/emj.2006.039792
Google Scholar: Look up in Google Scholar

Abstract

Background: Elbow injuries account for approximately 2–3% of presentations to the emergency department.
This is associated not only with a very high rate of x rays but also with a very high rate of ‘‘missed fractures’’
This study examines which components of elbow examination have the best correlation with a normal
radiograph.
Design setting: A district general hospital’s emergency department seeing 83 000 new attendances per
annum (pa) (approximately 1600 elbow injuries pa).
Methods: After estimating the power before data collection, all patients presenting with elbow injuries were
considered for inclusion, and were excluded only if they were unable to follow instructions owing to either
reduced conscious levels or mental conditions. A proforma was completed after patient examination,
indicating the features of clinical examination, and the results of radiographs if any. The formal report of all
radiographs taken was sought from the radiology department.
Results: 407 patients were entered into the study, of whom 331 received a radiograph of the elbow. Full
extension of the elbow had a specificity of 0.916 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.863 to 0.969, sensitivity
0.478) for detection of a normal radiograph. An equal range of movement ROM had a specificity of 0.976
(95% CI 0.940 to 0.991, sensitivity 0.211). Subgroup analysis of patients aged ,16 years showed a
specificity of equal ROM of 1 (95% CI 0.941 to 1.000) for the detection of a normal x ray.
Logistic regression analysis showed that best predictive values were achieved by a combination of full
extension, flexion and supination.
Conclusion: A two-tier clinical rule for management of elbow injury is proposed: (1) Those patients aged
<=16 years with a ROM equal to the unaffected side may be safely discharged; (2) Those patients with normal
extension, flexion and supination do not require emergent elbow radiographs.

Item Type: Journal Article
Copyright Holders: 2007 BMJ Group
ISSN: 1472-0213
Academic Unit/Department: Mathematics, Computing and Technology > Mathematics and Statistics
Item ID: 32577
Depositing User: Rachel Hilliam
Date Deposited: 16 Feb 2012 09:58
Last Modified: 17 Feb 2012 02:33
URI: http://oro.open.ac.uk/id/eprint/32577
Share this page:

Actions (login may be required)

View Item
Report issue / request change

Policies | Disclaimer

© The Open University   + 44 (0)870 333 4340   general-enquiries@open.ac.uk