The Open UniversitySkip to content
 

Naturalising deconstruction

Roden, David (2005). Naturalising deconstruction. Continental Philosophy Review, 38(1-2) pp. 71–88.

DOI (Digital Object Identifier) Link: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11007-005-9004-z
Google Scholar: Look up in Google Scholar

Abstract

Most contemporary readings of Derrida’s work situate it within a transcendental tradition of philosophical enquiry explicitly critical of naturalistic accounts of knowledge and mind. I argue that Derrida provides the naturalist with some of the philosophical resources needed to rebut transcendental critiques of naturalism, in particular the phenomenological critiques which derive from Husserl’s philosophy. I do this by showing: a) that Derrida’s account of temporality as differance undermines phenomenological accounts of the meaning of naturalistic theories and assumptions; and b) that it is itself both usable and interpretable within the naturalistic framework of current cognitive science.

Item Type: Journal Article
Copyright Holders: 2006 Springer
ISSN: 1573-1103
Academic Unit/Department: Arts > Philosophy
Item ID: 32510
Depositing User: David Roden
Date Deposited: 24 Feb 2012 10:22
Last Modified: 22 Aug 2012 14:31
URI: http://oro.open.ac.uk/id/eprint/32510
Share this page:

Actions (login may be required)

View Item
Report issue / request change

Policies | Disclaimer

© The Open University   + 44 (0)870 333 4340   general-enquiries@open.ac.uk