The Open UniversitySkip to content
 

Reducing Carbon emissions through transport taxation, GFC Briefing Paper 6

Ekins, Paul and Potter, Stephen (2010). Reducing Carbon emissions through transport taxation, GFC Briefing Paper 6. Green Fiscal Commission, London, UK.

Full text available as:
[img]
Preview
PDF - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
Download (334kB)
URL: http://www.greenfiscalcommission.org.uk/images/upl...
Google Scholar: Look up in Google Scholar

Abstract

Road transport and aviation are, or are becoming, major sources of carbon emissions which will need to be reduced if the UK’s carbon dioxide (CO2) reduction targets are to be met. However, since 1980 the real costs of motoring have fallen while those of other transport modes have risen, and rising incomes have also increased transport demand, offsetting efficiency increases. Increased road transport taxation, which could be introduced as part of a green fiscal reform, will be essential if demand is to be managed and carbon emissions from road transport reduced. Taxes on vehicle purchase, ownership and use have different effects, and can be used to pursue different policy goals. For example, taxes on purchase and ownership can incentivise manufacturers to develop low carbon vehicles and people to buy them. Tax measures on vehicle use are needed to reduce congestion and overall energy use. This briefing discusses experience with road transport and aviation taxes in the UK and other European countries, and considers how they might develop to take account of increasingly stringent CO2 reduction targets and other issues such as the increasing diversity of road fuels, and the need to maintain government income. In particular, any shift to electric vehicles may require a parallel shift to road user charging if revenues from transport taxes, and incentives to reduce the damaging effects of road transport apart from emissions, are to be maintained. Each tax introduced will affect some people more than others. Increasing fuel duty is progressive overall because most low-income households do not have a car, but there are concerns about the impact on low income motorists, particularly in rural areas, which can be at least partially addressed if the revenues are recycled in a progressive manner. Increasing taxation on air travel is even more progressive because most leisure flying is by the wealthiest 20 per cent of the population and those on low incomes fly very little.

Item Type: Other
Copyright Holders: 2010 Green Fiscal Commission
Extra Information: ISBN: 978-0-85374-845-8
Keywords: transport taxation; green fiscal reform
Academic Unit/School: Faculty of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) > Engineering and Innovation
Faculty of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM)
Related URLs:
Item ID: 32179
Depositing User: Stephen Potter
Date Deposited: 06 Feb 2012 17:30
Last Modified: 10 Nov 2017 11:18
URI: http://oro.open.ac.uk/id/eprint/32179
Share this page:

Download history for this item

These details should be considered as only a guide to the number of downloads performed manually. Algorithmic methods have been applied in an attempt to remove automated downloads from the displayed statistics but no guarantee can be made as to the accuracy of the figures.

Actions (login may be required)

Policies | Disclaimer

© The Open University   contact the OU