Due to copyright restrictions, this file is not available for public download
Click here to request a copy from the OU Author.
|DOI (Digital Object Identifier) Link:||https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886311405145|
|Google Scholar:||Look up in Google Scholar|
This article concerns what is involved in breaking out of entrenched adversarial models for running interorganizational projects within the construction sector. It presents data from two case studies that sought to establish a more collaborative project model. Drawing on literatures about institutional change and interorganizational collaboration, the analysis indicates the importance of three kinds of activities. First, it is possible to mobilize potential for change present within existing institutionalized models by selecting a kernel of participating organizations known to have the capabilities to operationalize collaboration. Second, adopting techniques for working together that make explicit the need to balance project objectives with organizational-level commercial viability leads to the enactment of routines through which a wider pool of project participants can develop a sense of competence and confidence in collaboration. Third, there is a necessity to preserve a unified system of authority within the project that ensures adherence to collaborative routines, although otherwise encouraging autonomy in decision making.
|Item Type:||Journal Article|
|Copyright Holders:||2011 NTL Institute|
|Project Funding Details:||
|Keywords:||projects; institutional change; new practice development; interorganizational relationships; interorganizational development; collaboration; construction|
|Academic Unit/Department:||Faculty of Business and Law (FBL) > Business
Faculty of Business and Law (FBL)
|Depositing User:||Richard Holti|
|Date Deposited:||30 Jan 2012 10:30|
|Last Modified:||06 Oct 2016 16:36|
|Share this page:|