The Open UniversitySkip to content
 

Health inequalities in England, Scotland and Wales: stakeholders' accounts and policy compared

Harrington, B. E.; Smith, K. E.; Hunter, D. J.; Marks, L.; Blackman, T. J.; McKee, L.; Greene, A.; Elliott, E. and Williams, G. H. (2009). Health inequalities in England, Scotland and Wales: stakeholders' accounts and policy compared. Public Health, 123(1) e24-e28.

DOI (Digital Object Identifier) Link: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2008.10.010
Google Scholar: Look up in Google Scholar

Abstract

Objectives: The election of a Labour government in 1997 brought the issue of health inequalities firmly back onto the policy agenda across the UK. Since then, in the wake of devolution, the need to tackle health inequalities has been highlighted as a policy priority in all three mainland UK countries, albeit with varying degrees of emphasis. This paper reports on a major cross-national, ESRC funded study investigating how NHS bodies, local councils and partnerships make sense of their work on health inequalities, and examining the difference made by the contrasting approaches that have been taken to performance assessment in England, Wales and Scotland.

Study Design: Case-studies, semi-structured interviews and analysis of key policy statements.

Methods: In order to explore how health inequalities have been approached by the three governments (noting that during this time there was a change in governments in Wales and Scotland) key policy statements published between May 1997 and May 2007 were analysed. Concurrently, data from stakeholder interviews carried out in 2006 in case study areas in each country were analysed to determine the extent of alignment between policy and practice at a local level.

Results: This paper suggests that claims about the extent of health policy divergence in post-devolution Britain may have been exaggerated. It finds that, whilst the three countries have taken differing approaches to performance assessment and the setting of targets, policy approaches to health inequalities appear to have been remarkably similar, up until 2007. Furthermore, the first round of interview data suggest that variations in local understandings of, and responses to, health inequalities cannot always be clearly distinguished along national lines.

Conclusions: Based on the policy analysis, devolution in the UK would not appear to have resulted in substantively different national policy approaches to health inequalities. Indeed, the overall analysis suggests that (prior to the 2007 elections in Scotland and Wales) the differences between local areas within countries may be of as much interest as those between countries.

Item Type: Journal Article
Copyright Holders: 2008 The Royal Society for Public Health
ISSN: 0033-3506
Project Funding Details:
Funded Project NameProject IDFunding Body
Not SetNot SetESRC
Keywords: health inequality; health policy; devolution; performance assessment; United Kingdom
Academic Unit/Department: Other Departments > Other Departments
Related URLs:
Item ID: 30977
Depositing User: Tim Blackman
Date Deposited: 05 Jan 2012 09:09
Last Modified: 19 Mar 2014 16:08
URI: http://oro.open.ac.uk/id/eprint/30977
Share this page:

Actions (login may be required)

View Item
Report issue / request change

Policies | Disclaimer

© The Open University   + 44 (0)870 333 4340   general-enquiries@open.ac.uk