Wallis, Jennifer; Burns, Jan and Capdevila, Rose
This is the latest version of this eprint.
|DOI (Digital Object Identifier) Link:||http://doi.org/10.1080/14780880701734545|
|Google Scholar:||Look up in Google Scholar|
Q methodology and a Delphi poll combined qualitative and quantitative methods to explore definitions of White and Epston’s (1990) narrative approach to therapy among a group of UK practitioners. A Delphi poll was used to generate statements about narrative therapy. The piloting of statements by the Delphi panel identified agreement about theoretical ideas underpinning narrative therapy and certain key practices. A wider group of practitioners ranked the statements in a Q sort and made qualitative comments about their sorting. Quantitative methods (principal components analysis) were used to extract eight accounts of narrative therapy, five of which are qualitatively analysed in this paper. Agreement and differences were identified across a range of issues, including the social construction of narratives, privileging a political stance or narrative techniques and the relationship with other therapies, specifically systemic psychotherapy. Q methodology, combined with the Delphi poll, was a unique and innovative feature of this study.
|Item Type:||Journal Article|
|Copyright Holders:||2009 Taylor & Francis Group|
|Keywords:||critical psychology; Delphi poll; narrative therapy; Q methodology; qualitative methods; Q sorting; Q statements; social constructionism; systemic psychotherapy|
|Academic Unit/Department:||Social Sciences > Psychology in the Social Sciences
|Interdisciplinary Research Centre:||Centre for Citizenship, Identities and Governance (CCIG)|
|Depositing User:||Rose Capdevila|
|Date Deposited:||05 Jan 2012 10:29|
|Last Modified:||18 Jan 2016 11:45|
|Share this page:|
Available Versions of this Item
- Q methodology and a Delphi poll: a useful approach to researching a narrative approach to therapy. (deposited 05 Jan 2012 10:29) [Currently Displayed]