Tilley, Elizabeth; Earle, Sarah; Walmsley, Jan and Atkinson, Dorothy
PDF (Accepted Manuscript)
- Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
|DOI (Digital Object Identifier) Link:||http://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2012.654991|
|Google Scholar:||Look up in Google Scholar|
This paper reviews the history of sterilization of women with intellectual disabilities, and considers its relevance to current practice regarding reproductive choice and futures. The paper provides an overview of published research on historical practices, focusing on the UK, the US, Canada and the Nordic countries. Most of this research draws upon written records, centering on eugenics debates. However, emerging oral history testimonies gathered by the authors suggest that sterilization procedures were also conducted in the community, the result of private negotiations between parents and medical practitioners. The article presents these accounts and calls for an end to a ‘roaring silence’ on this issue. More empirical studies are needed to recover the experiences of women who have been sterilized and to explore how decisions about reproductive choice and capacity were made in the past and continue to be made today.
Key words: Sterilization; intellectual disability; contraception; history.
|Item Type:||Journal Article|
|Copyright Holders:||2012 Disability and Society|
|Extra Information:||This is an electronic version of an article published in [include the complete citation information for the final version of the article as published in the print edition of the journal]. Disability and Society is available online at: www.tandfonline.com|
|Keywords:||sterilization; intellectual disability; contraception; history|
|Academic Unit/Department:||Health and Social Care > Health and Social Care
Health and Social Care
|Depositing User:||Sarah Earle|
|Date Deposited:||25 Jan 2012 16:44|
|Last Modified:||24 Feb 2016 03:07|
|Share this page:|
► Automated document suggestions from open access sources
Download history for this item
These details should be considered as only a guide to the number of downloads performed manually. Algorithmic methods have been applied in an attempt to remove automated downloads from the displayed statistics but no guarantee can be made as to the accuracy of the figures.