The Open UniversitySkip to content
 

Comparing pension systems in the circular flow of income

Trigg, Andrew B. and Lowe, Jonquil T. (2011). Comparing pension systems in the circular flow of income. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 70(5) pp. 1248–1281.

Full text available as:
Full text not publicly available (Version of Record)
Due to publisher licensing restrictions, this file is not available for public download
Click here to request a copy from the OU Author.
DOI (Digital Object Identifier) Link: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1536-7150.2011.00811.x
Google Scholar: Look up in Google Scholar

Abstract

The neoliberal consensus is that state funded pensions are not sustainable in the long term, due to declining fertility and longevity. In response, policymakers have pointed to the advantages of privately funded pension systems. This article compares the social provisioning of these two systems using the circular flow of income as an organizing framework. A series of pitfalls in the private model are examined, including inequality of provision, mis-selling of investment products, and punitive charges.

Item Type: Journal Item
Copyright Holders: 2011 American Journal of Economics and Sociology Inc
ISSN: 1536-7150
Keywords: pensions; circular flow; state pensions; private pensions; social provisioning
Academic Unit/School: Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences (FASS) > Politics, Philosophy, Economics, Development, Geography > Economics
Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences (FASS) > Politics, Philosophy, Economics, Development, Geography
Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences (FASS)
Research Group: Innovation, Knowledge & Development research centre (IKD)
Related URLs:
Item ID: 30458
Depositing User: Jonquil Lowe
Date Deposited: 16 Jan 2012 09:31
Last Modified: 02 May 2018 13:34
URI: http://oro.open.ac.uk/id/eprint/30458
Share this page:

Metrics

Altmetrics from Altmetric

Citations from Dimensions

Actions (login may be required)

Policies | Disclaimer

© The Open University   contact the OU