Copy the page URI to the clipboard
Trigg, Andrew B. and Lowe, Jonquil T.
(2011).
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1536-7150.2011.00811.x
Abstract
The neoliberal consensus is that state funded pensions are not sustainable in the long term, due to declining fertility and longevity. In response, policymakers have pointed to the advantages of privately funded pension systems. This article compares the social provisioning of these two systems using the circular flow of income as an organizing framework. A series of pitfalls in the private model are examined, including inequality of provision, mis-selling of investment products, and punitive charges.
Viewing alternatives
Metrics
Public Attention
Altmetrics from AltmetricNumber of Citations
Citations from Dimensions- Request a copy from the author This file is not available for public download
Item Actions
Export
About
- Item ORO ID
- 30458
- Item Type
- Journal Item
- ISSN
- 1536-7150
- Keywords
- pensions; circular flow; state pensions; private pensions; social provisioning
- Academic Unit or School
-
Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences (FASS) > Social Sciences and Global Studies > Economics
Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences (FASS) > Social Sciences and Global Studies
Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences (FASS) - Research Group
- Innovation, Knowledge & Development research centre (IKD)
- Copyright Holders
- © 2011 American Journal of Economics and Sociology Inc
- Related URLs
- Depositing User
- Jonquil Lowe