The Open UniversitySkip to content

Self-rated competences questionnaires from a design perspective

Braun, Edith; Woodley, Alan; Richardson, John T. E. and Leidner, Bernhard (2012). Self-rated competences questionnaires from a design perspective. Educational Research Review, 7(1) pp. 1–18.

DOI (Digital Object Identifier) Link:
Google Scholar: Look up in Google Scholar


This paper provides a theoretical review of self-rated competences questionnaires. This topic is influenced by the ongoing world-wide reform of higher education, which has led to a focus on the learner outcomes of higher education. Consequently, questionnaires on self-rated competences have increasingly been employed. However, self-ratings are often criticised for their lack of validity. Our intention is to outline some principles of good questionnaire design and to use these principles to contrast questionnaires on self-rated competences. We begin with an overview of research about questionnaire design. Then we introduce seven questionnaires and portray them in terms of their design characteristics. A comparison reveals some significant points: biographical data need to be handled more carefully, and there is an overuse of vague and abstract language. On the positive side, all of the questionnaires that were examined provide reliable sub-scales covering important facets of competences.

Item Type: Journal Item
Copyright Holders: 2011 Elsevier Ltd
ISSN: 1747-938X
Keywords: self rated-competences; higher education; questionnaire design
Academic Unit/School: Institute of Educational Technology (IET)
Research Group: Centre for Research in Education and Educational Technology (CREET)
Item ID: 30227
Depositing User: John T. E. Richardson
Date Deposited: 24 Jan 2012 09:06
Last Modified: 13 Dec 2019 08:57
Share this page:


Altmetrics from Altmetric

Citations from Dimensions

Actions (login may be required)

Policies | Disclaimer

© The Open University   contact the OU