Due to copyright restrictions, this file is not available for public download
Click here to request a copy from the OU Author.
|Google Scholar:||Look up in Google Scholar|
This chapter sketches a contrast between a psychology in the key of life and a psychology in the key of matter. The traditional scientific methods of the latter have obscured questions of life and consciousness, but these questions can be re-opened through an engagement with the relational process thinking associated with figures such as Bergson, James, Whitehead and Canguilhem. To assist such a ‘key change’, this chapter will engage principally with the work of George Canguilhem and Alfred North Whitehead in order to articulate the importance of the conception of life in process thinking. In so doing I will contrast a psychology in the key of life (which assumes a unitary cosmology and places emphasis on a virtual future in process of actualisation) with a psychology in the key of lifeless matter (which assumes a bifurcated cosmology and limits itself to efficient causality from the past).
|Item Type:||Book Chapter|
|Copyright Holders:||2011 International Society for Theoretical Psychology|
|Academic Unit/Department:||Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences (FASS) > Psychology
Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences (FASS)
|Interdisciplinary Research Centre:||Centre for Citizenship, Identities and Governance (CCIG)|
|Depositing User:||Paul Stenner|
|Date Deposited:||21 Nov 2011 09:57|
|Last Modified:||04 Oct 2016 13:17|
|Share this page:|