Due to copyright restrictions, this file is not available for public download
Click here to request a copy from the OU Author.
|DOI (Digital Object Identifier) Link:||http://doi.org/10.1037/a0017569|
|Google Scholar:||Look up in Google Scholar|
This paper provides a critical commentary on Slife and Reber’s paper entitled “Is there a pervasive implicit bias against theism in psychology?” Drawing upon A.N. Whitehead’s process philosophy, the paper challenges the bifurcation between naturalism and theism and suggests that religion be better conceived as world-loyalty than as supernaturalism.
|Item Type:||Journal Article|
|Copyright Holders:||2009 American Psychological Association|
|Academic Unit/Department:||Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences (FASS) > Psychology
Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences (FASS)
|Interdisciplinary Research Centre:||Centre for Citizenship, Identities and Governance (CCIG)|
|Depositing User:||Paul Stenner|
|Date Deposited:||01 Dec 2011 13:58|
|Last Modified:||05 Oct 2016 01:16|
|Share this page:|