Copy the page URI to the clipboard
Stenner, Paul
(2011).
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2010.511997
URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/1364298...
Abstract
This article addresses how non-experts understand the general notion of human rights. After a discussion of the various ways in which human rights are understood by experts and lay people, new Q methodological results are presented. Results support previous research in suggesting the existence of at least four distinct ways of understanding human rights: as grounded universals; as a focus for radical political action; as socio-political constructions; and as agreements balanced against responsibilities. Other understandings draw upon religious foundations and notions of community belonging. These ways of understanding human rights are described in empirical detail and their implications for human rights discourse briefly discussed.
Viewing alternatives
Download history
Metrics
Public Attention
Altmetrics from AltmetricNumber of Citations
Citations from DimensionsItem Actions
Export
About
- Item ORO ID
- 30126
- Item Type
- Journal Item
- ISSN
- 1744-053X
- Keywords
- Q methodology; subjective dimensions of human rights
- Academic Unit or School
-
Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences (FASS) > Psychology and Counselling > Psychology
Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences (FASS) > Psychology and Counselling
Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences (FASS) - Copyright Holders
- © 2011 Taylor & Francis
- Depositing User
- Paul Stenner