Due to copyright restrictions, this file is not available for public download
Click here to request a copy from the OU Author.
|DOI (Digital Object Identifier) Link:||http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1007/s11229-011-0015-5|
|Google Scholar:||Look up in Google Scholar|
This paper aims to develop the implications of logical expressivism for a theory of dialogue coherence. I proceed in three steps. Firstly, certain structural properties of cooperative dialogue are identified. Secondly, I describe a variant of the multi-agent natural deduction calculus that I introduced in Piwek (J Logic Lang Inf 16(4):403–421, 2007) and demonstrate how it accounts for the aforementioned structures. Thirdly, I examine how the aforementioned system can be used to formalise an expressivist account of logical vocabulary that is inspired by Brandom (Making it explicit: reasoning, representing, and discursive commitment, 1994; Articulating reasons: an introduction to inferentialism, 2000). This account conceives of the logical vocabulary as a tool which allows speakers to describe the inferential practices which underlie their language use, i.e., it allows them to make those practices explicit. The rewards of this exercise are twofold: (1) We obtain a more precise account of logical expressivism which can be defended more effectively against the critique that such accounts lead to cultural relativism. (2) The formalised distinction between engaging in a practice and expressing it, opens the way for a revision of the theory of dialogue coherence. This revision eliminates the need for logically complex formulae to account for certain structural properties of cooperative dialogue.
|Item Type:||Journal Article|
|Copyright Holders:||2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.|
|Extra Information:||Special issue: Theories of Information Dynamics and Interaction and their Application to Dialogue; guest editors, Emiliano Lorini and Laure Vieu.
The paper has two numberings for the pages. Firstly, the numbering of the Synthese journal and, secondly, the numbering for the Knowledge, Rationality and Action, a special section of Synthese. The information printed on the paper says:
Synthese (2011) 183:33–58
Knowledge, Rationality & Action 253–278
|Keywords:||dialogue coherence; logical expressivism; natural deduction; logical vocabulary; inferential practices|
|Academic Unit/Department:||Mathematics, Computing and Technology > Computing|
|Interdisciplinary Research Centre:||Centre for Research in Computing (CRC)|
|Depositing User:||Paul Piwek|
|Date Deposited:||10 Nov 2011 15:21|
|Last Modified:||03 Dec 2012 15:43|
Actions (login may be required)
|Public: Report issue / request change|