Havard, Catriona; Memon, Amina; Laybourn, Phyllis and Cunningham, Clare
Due to copyright restrictions, this file is not available for public download
Click here to request a copy from the OU Author.
|DOI (Digital Object Identifier) Link:||http://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2011.598156|
|Google Scholar:||Look up in Google Scholar|
The present study investigated whether child (six–eight years of age) and adult witnesses (18–29 years of age) would exhibit an own-age bias when trying to identify targets from video lineups. One hundred and eighty-six participants viewed two filmed events that were identical, except one starred a child target and one a young adult. After a delay of two–three days each witness saw a lineup for the child and adult target. Children exhibited an own-age bias and were better at correctly identifying the own-age target from a target-present (TP) lineup and made more correct rejections for the own-age target-absent (TA) lineup. Adults however, showed a reversed own-age bias for the TP lineups as they made more correct identifications for the child target, but exhibited no bias for the TA lineups. The results suggest that differences in identification accuracy may be due to whether witness age and suspect age overlap.
|Item Type:||Journal Article|
|Copyright Holders:||2012 Taylor & Francis|
|Keywords:||child eyewitness; adult witnesses; age; identification accuracy; recognition|
|Academic Unit/Department:||Social Sciences > Psychology in the Social Sciences
|Interdisciplinary Research Centre:||Harm and Evidence Research Collaborative (HERC)|
|Depositing User:||Catriona Havard|
|Date Deposited:||20 Oct 2011 12:41|
|Last Modified:||17 Jul 2016 16:11|
|Share this page:|