Havard, Catriona; Memon, Amina; Clifford, Brian and Gabbert, Fiona
Due to copyright restrictions, this file is not available for public download
Click here to request a copy from the OU Author.
|DOI (Digital Object Identifier) Link:||https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1645|
|Google Scholar:||Look up in Google Scholar|
In the UK video parades are the preferred method of identification employed in criminal cases. This policy implementation has been employed with little or no evidence concerning its validity. The reported research examines the effect of new video technology on children's identification evidence. The study compared 7–9 and 13–15-year olds' ability to make identifications from either video or static photo lineups. Two hundred and fifteen participants witnessed a live event and then after a delay of 2–3 days viewed a target present (TP), or target absent (TA) video or photo lineup. For video and photo TP lineups, correct responses did not differ as a function of age. Video lineups produced lower rates of false identifications for the TA lineups, but only for adolescent witnesses. It is concluded that there is nothing contra-indicated in the use of video identification procedures with children, and possibly certain benefits can accrue from its use.
|Item Type:||Journal Article|
|Copyright Holders:||2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.|
|Academic Unit/School:||Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences (FASS) > Psychology
Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences (FASS)
|Interdisciplinary Research Centre:||Centre for Policing Research and Learning (CPRL)
Harm and Evidence Research Collaborative (HERC)
|Depositing User:||Catriona Havard|
|Date Deposited:||20 Oct 2011 12:35|
|Last Modified:||26 Nov 2016 17:49|
|Share this page:|