Copy the page URI to the clipboard
Bell, Simon and Morse, Stephen
(2011).
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2011.566851
Abstract
Indicators and indices (I&I) have been popular among a section of the policy and science communities for some years and are often promoted as a vehicle to help make sustainable development a reality. One of the claimed strengths of I&I is their ability to present complex data and trends to policy-makers. It is assumed that I&I can help to make policy and, indeed, management more transparently evidence based; yet this assumption has rarely been tested. This paper describes the results of a research project designed to address this assumption. Three main conclusions were arrived at:
(1) I&I are not static measures that are created and remain constant but instead they change with time as a result of a “natural selection” process;
(2) there is value in a move away from the dominance of a limited number of I&I in policy towards a more diverse set of I&I, but there are many obstacles to achieving this; and
(3) the evidence-based rationality of which I&I are meant to be a constituent does not exist. I&I are but one source of influence among many. Indeed, what is meant by “success” with regard to a policy influence of I&I is debatable.
Viewing alternatives
Metrics
Public Attention
Altmetrics from AltmetricNumber of Citations
Citations from Dimensions- Request a copy from the author This file is not available for public download
Item Actions
Export
About
- Item ORO ID
- 29684
- Item Type
- Journal Item
- ISSN
- 1469-6711
- Keywords
- indicators; indices; evidence-based policy; sustainable development; European Union; stakeholder participation
- Academic Unit or School
-
Faculty of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) > Engineering and Innovation
Faculty of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) - Copyright Holders
- © 2011 Taylor & Francis
- Depositing User
- Simon Bell