This is the latest version of this eprint.
|DOI (Digital Object Identifier) Link:||http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2311.2006.00403.x|
|Google Scholar:||Look up in Google Scholar|
Studies of international youth justice, punishment and control are in their infancy but the issues of globalisation, transnationalisation, policy transfer and localisation are gradually being addressed. There also appears a growing demand in policy and pressure group circles in the UK to learn more about other jurisdictions in order to emulate ‘best practice’ and avoid the worst excesses of punitive populism. However, existing comparative work in this area rarely ventures much beyond country specific descriptions of historical development, powers and procedures. Statistical comparisons – predominantly of custody rates – are becoming more sophisticated but remain beset with problems of partial and inaccurate data collection. The extent to which different countries do things differently, and how and why such difference is maintained, remains a relatively unexcavated territory. This article suggests a conceptually comparative framework in which degrees of international, national and local convergence and divergence can begin to be revealed and assessed.
|Item Type:||Journal Article|
|Copyright Holders:||2006 The Author|
|Academic Unit/Department:||Social Sciences > Social Policy and Criminology
|Interdisciplinary Research Centre:||International Centre for Comparative Criminological Research (ICCCR)
Harm and Evidence Research Collaborative (HERC)
|Depositing User:||John Muncie|
|Date Deposited:||06 Oct 2011 09:29|
|Last Modified:||15 Jul 2016 14:15|
|Share this page:|
Available Versions of this Item
Responsibilisation and Rights: explorations in comparative youth criminology. (deposited 30 Mar 2007)
- Responsibilisation and rights: explorations in comparative youth criminology. (deposited 06 Oct 2011 09:29) [Currently Displayed]