The Open UniversitySkip to content
 

Productivity is a poor predictor of plant species richness

Adler, Peter B.; Seabloom, Eric W.; Borer, Elizabeth T.; Hillebrand, Helmut; Hautier, Yann; Hector, Andy; Harpole, W. Stanley; O'Halloran, Lydia R.; Grace, James B.; Anderson, T. Michael; Bakker, Jonathan D.; Biederman, Lori A.; Brown, Cynthia S.; Buckley, Yvonne M.; Calabrese, Laura B.; Chu, Cheng-Jin; Cleland, Elsa E.; Collins, Scott L.; Cottingham, Kathryn L.; Crawley, Michael J.; Damschen, Ellen I.; Davies, Kendi F.; DeCrappeo, Nicole M.; Fay, Philip A.; Firn, Jennifer; Frater, Paul; Gasarch, Eve I.; Gruner, Daniel S.; Hagenah, Nicole; Hille Ris Lambers, Janneke; Humphries, Hope; Jin, Virginia L.; Kay, Adam D,; Kirkman, Kevin P.; Klein, Julia A.; Knops, Johannes M. H.; La Pierre, Kimberley J.; Lambrinos, John G.; Li, Wei; MacDougall, Andrew S.; McCulley, Rebecca L.; Melbourne, Brett A.; Mitchell, Charles E.; Moore, Joslin L.; Morgan, John W.; Mortensen, Brent; Orrock, John L.; Prober, Suzanne M.; Pyke, David A.; Risch, Anita C.; Schuetz, Martin; Smith, Melinda D.; Stevens, Carly J.; Sullivan, Lauren L.; Wang, Gang; Wragg, Peter D.; Wright, Justin P. and Yang, Louie H. (2011). Productivity is a poor predictor of plant species richness. Science, 333(6050) pp. 1750–1753.

Full text available as:
Full text not publicly available
Due to copyright restrictions, this file is not available for public download

  • Due to copyright restrictions, this file is not available for public download
URL: http://www.sciencemag.org/content/333/6050/1750.ab...
DOI (Digital Object Identifier) Link: http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1204498
Google Scholar: Look up in Google Scholar

Abstract

For over 30 years, the relationship between net primary productivity and species richness has generated intense debate in ecology about the processes regulating local diversity. The original view, still widely accepted, holds that the relationship is hump-shaped, with richness first rising and then declining with increasing productivity. Although recent meta-analyses questioned the generality of hump-shaped patterns, these syntheses have been criticized for failing to account for methodological differences among studies. We addressed such concerns by conducting standardized sampling in 48 herbaceous-dominated plant communities on five continents. We found no clear relationship between productivity and fine-scale (meters-2) richness within sites, within regions, or across the globe. Ecologists should focus on novel, mechanistic approaches to understand the multivariate links between productivity and richness.

Item Type: Journal Article
Copyright Holders: 2011 AAAS
ISSN: 0036-8075
Project Funding Details:
Funded Project NameProject IDFunding Body
Not SetNot SetIndividual researchers and coordinated through Research Coordination Network funding from NSF to E. Borer and E. Seabloom (grant DEB-0741952).
Academic Unit/Department: Science > Environment, Earth and Ecosystems
Item ID: 29657
Depositing User: Carly Stevens
Date Deposited: 05 Oct 2011 10:27
Last Modified: 04 Apr 2014 20:17
URI: http://oro.open.ac.uk/id/eprint/29657
Share this page:

Actions (login may be required)

View Item
Report issue / request change

Policies | Disclaimer

© The Open University   + 44 (0)870 333 4340   general-enquiries@open.ac.uk