Stenner, Paul
(2011).
![]()
|
PDF (Version of Record)
- Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
Download (257kB) |
URL: | http://lnx.journalofpragmatism.eu/wp-content/uploa... |
---|---|
Google Scholar: | Look up in Google Scholar |
Abstract
This paper contributes to a growing body of philosophical and psychological work that draws parallels between the writings of William James and Alfred North Whitehead. In Part One I introduce Whitehead’s distinction between assemblage and systematization (section 1) and suggest that Whitehead’s philosophy was in part a systematization of James’ psychological and philosophical assemblage (section 2). The systematization is based on a rethinking of the entity/function contrast (section 3) by way of Whitehead’s concept of the actual entity/occasion (section 4). This permits a process-oriented ontological extension and James’ notion of pure experience (sections 5 & 6), which yields a deepened version of radical empiricism (section 7). The four sections of Part Two build a more specific argument that James’ often implicit distinctions between energetic, perceptual, conceptual and discursive modes of experience can be systematized by way of Whitehead’s concepts of causal efficacy, presentational immediacy and symbolic reference. Following the suggestion of Magritte’s famous Ceci n’est pas une Pipe artwork, this yields an analysis of the sum of human experience into four progressively integrated factors: power, image, proposition and enunciation.
Item Type: | Journal Item |
---|---|
Copyright Holders: | 2009 Associazione Pragma |
ISSN: | 2036-4091 |
Academic Unit/School: | Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences (FASS) > Psychology Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences (FASS) |
Item ID: | 29619 |
Depositing User: | Paul Stenner |
Date Deposited: | 27 Sep 2011 09:11 |
Last Modified: | 19 Dec 2017 10:31 |
URI: | http://oro.open.ac.uk/id/eprint/29619 |
Share this page: | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download history for this item
These details should be considered as only a guide to the number of downloads performed manually. Algorithmic methods have been applied in an attempt to remove automated downloads from the displayed statistics but no guarantee can be made as to the accuracy of the figures.