Blundel, Richard; Monaghan, Adrian and Thomas, Christine
This is the latest version of this eprint.
- Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
|Google Scholar:||Look up in Google Scholar|
• To review the literature on enterprise policy and purposive sustainability transitions
• To present comparative case-based analyses of entrepreneurial activity in different transitions
• To draw out the implications for research, policy and practice
Our paper is framed around the socio-technical transitions literature, with a particular focus on entrepreneurship and enterprise policy. It builds on previous work, in which we challenged pre-conceptions about the role of entrepreneurial actors in purposive sustainability transitions. In this paper, we build on these themes and draw out the implications for SME and entrepreneurship policies in Europe.
We conduct a critical review of recent policy developments, with selected case-based illustrations that involve various kinds of purposive sustainability transition. This concludes with a brief reflection on the main similarities and differences in terms of governance mechanisms and entrepreneurship infrastructures. We note that, while cross-national agreements, such as EU-ETS and the European Small Business Act, provide overarching frameworks, there is considerable variety in enterprise policies at a national level (e.g. goals, approaches, target audiences, performance), which overlay, and interact with, pre-existing geographic variations in entrepreneurial activity.
Our argument is based around the following observations: (i) there is a groundswell of entrepreneurial activity oriented towards environmental sustainability; (ii) many governments have recognised that entrepreneurs can be key actors in the design and delivery of sustainability initiatives; (iii) transitions scholars have already highlighted many specific instances of entrepreneurial agency; (iv) there is now an urgent requirement to consolidate and build on this evidence base, in order to draw out practical implications for enterprise policy conception and implementation.
Traditionally, enterprise policies have been framed and evaluated with a primary focus on economic criteria, such as job creation and economic growth. A new set of challenges arises when governments seek to reorient policy around more ambitious and multi-faceted sustainability goals. For example: evidence on the long-term outcomes of previous policy initiatives are mixed, whether at firm-level or across geographic regions; there are difficulties in isolating the impact of particular policies even when relevant statistical measures and datasets (e.g. for unemployment and GDP) are generally available; and policies are now being developed in a much wider range of contexts, including newly-industrialised and developing countries.
The study is designed to inform future research and policy-making. It makes connections between the socio-technical transitions literature and relevant research on entrepreneurship and enterprise policy, in pursuit of entrepreneurial activities that contribute to more effective and equitable sustainability transitions.
|Item Type:||Conference Item|
|Copyright Holders:||2011 The Authors|
|Keywords:||environmental sustainability; transitions; enterprise policy; SMEs; entrepreneurship|
|Academic Unit/School:||Faculty of Business and Law (FBL) > Business
Faculty of Business and Law (FBL)
|Interdisciplinary Research Centre:||Innovation, Knowledge & Development research centre (IKD)
International Development & Inclusive Innovation
|Depositing User:||Richard Blundel|
|Date Deposited:||30 Sep 2011 08:10|
|Last Modified:||10 Feb 2017 03:04|
|Share this page:|
Available Versions of this Item
Evaluating the role of enterprise policies in purposive sustainability transitions: a case-based comparison. (deposited 30 Sep 2011 08:11)
- Evaluating the role of enterprise policies in purposive sustainability transitions: a case-based comparison. (deposited 30 Sep 2011 08:10) [Currently Displayed]
Download history for this item
These details should be considered as only a guide to the number of downloads performed manually. Algorithmic methods have been applied in an attempt to remove automated downloads from the displayed statistics but no guarantee can be made as to the accuracy of the figures.