Duval, Erik ; Wild, Fridolin; Scott, Peter; Ullmann, Thomas and Lindstaedt, Stefanie eds. (2010). Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Research 2.0. CEUR-WS.
|Google Scholar:||Look up in Google Scholar|
Research2.0 is in essence a Web2.0 approach to how we do research. Research2.0 creates conversations between researchers, enables them to discuss their findings and connects them with others. Thus, Research2.0 can accelerate the diffusion of knowledge.
As concluded during the workshop, at least four challenges are vital for future research.
The first area is concerned with availability of data. Access to sanitized data and conventions on how to describe publication-related metadata provided from divergent sources are enablers for researchers to develop new views on their publications and their research area. Additional, social media data gain more and more attention. Reaching a widespread agreement about this for the field of technology-enhanced learning would be already a major step, but it is also important to focus on the next steps: what are success-critical added values driving uptake in the research community as a whole?
The second area of challenges is seen in Research 2.0 practices. As technology-enhanced learning is a multidisciplinary field, practices developed in one area could be valuable for others. To extract the essence of successful multidisciplinary Research 2.0 practice though, multidimensional and longitudinal empirical work is needed. It is also an open question, if we should support practice by fostering the usage of existing tools or the development of new tools, which follow Research 2.0 principles. What makes a practice sustainable? What are the driving factors?
The third challenge deals with impact. What are criteria of impact for research results (and other research artefacts) published on the Web? How can this be related to the publishing world appearing in print? Is a link equal to a citation or a download equal to a subscription? Can we develop a Research 2.0 specific position on impact measurement? This includes questions of authority, quality and re-evaluation of quality, and trust.
The tension between openness and privacy spans the fourth challenge. The functionality of mash-ups often relies on the use of third-party services. What happens with the data, if this source is no longer available? What about hidden exchange of data among backend services?
|Item Type:||Edited Book|
|Copyright Holders:||2010 for the individual papers by the papers' authors, 2010 This volume is published and copyrighted by its editors|
|Extra Information:||ISSN: 1613-0073
Workshop held at the 5th European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning: Sustaining TEL.
|Academic Unit/Department:||Knowledge Media Institute|
|Interdisciplinary Research Centre:||Centre for Research in Computing (CRC)|
|Depositing User:||Kay Dave|
|Date Deposited:||26 Sep 2011 09:41|
|Last Modified:||23 Oct 2012 14:30|
Actions (login may be required)
|Report issue / request change|