Due to copyright restrictions, this file is not available for public download
Click here to request a copy from the OU Author.
|DOI (Digital Object Identifier) Link:||http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1080/14681994.2010.518714|
|Google Scholar:||Look up in Google Scholar|
Following from the previous two articles in this series, in the previous issue of this journal, this article will complete the journey through guidance writing for publication. In 2009 and 2010 Taylor & Francis funded two workshops on this topic for members of the British Association for Sexual and Relationship Therapy. Using some of the exercises and feedback from these workshops these linked articles will consider the structure, tone and content of academic writing. After that, the current article will go through the process of submitting for publication, the review process and revising written work. The article will encourage readers to come up with a definite plan for a piece of written work.
|Item Type:||Journal Article|
|Copyright Holders:||2011 College of Sexual and Relationship Therapists|
|Keywords:||style; content; structure; submission; review; writing; research; evaluation; reflexivity; case-studies; quantitative; qualitative|
|Academic Unit/Department:||Social Sciences > Psychology in the Social Sciences|
|Interdisciplinary Research Centre:||Centre for Citizenship, Identities and Governance (CCIG)|
|Depositing User:||Meg Barker|
|Date Deposited:||16 Aug 2011 08:21|
|Last Modified:||24 Oct 2012 04:04|
Actions (login may be required)
|Public: Report issue / request change|