The Open UniversitySkip to content

Political peace - educational war: the role played by international organisations in negotiating peace in the Balkans and its consequences for education

Owen-Jackson, Gwyneth (2008). Political peace - educational war: the role played by international organisations in negotiating peace in the Balkans and its consequences for education. Research in Comparative and International Education, 3(1) pp. 79–90.


This is the latest version of this eprint.

Full text available as:
PDF (Version of Record) - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
Download (200Kb)
DOI (Digital Object Identifier) Link:
Google Scholar: Look up in Google Scholar


The number of countries involved in conflict appears to be growing. Global awareness of these conflicts grows as the increasing use of weblogs and mobile phone videos, alongside traditional technologies, demonstrates the day-to-day effects of conflict on those caught up in it. International organisations are drawn into negotiating ‘peace settlements’ and into monitoring post-conflict developments due to this growing global awareness of conflict and due to the influences of globalisation, increasing economic interdependence and other factors. International organisations, including the World Bank and agencies of the United Nations, try to find common ground between opposing factions in conflict situations in order to broker peace. This is not an easy task and compromises often have to be made. Peace agreements and settlements also need to take account of how the parties will work together in the future, and therefore, these may include aspects of educational provision. This article describes the role played by international organisations in negotiating the peace agreement that brought about the end of the conflict in the countries of the former Yugoslavia in 1995. It goes on to illustrate the consequences for education of this peace agreement and suggests that, whilst international organisations may have brokered peace on the streets, the opposing factions are continuing their war in the terrain of continuing educational conflicts, due at least in part to structures for educational provision laid out in the Dayton Agreement. The article provides support for Bush & Saltarelli’s claim that education has two faces, and argues that in this case, unfortunately, the negative one predominates.

Item Type: Journal Article
Copyright Holders: 2008 Research in Comparative and International Education
ISSN: 1745-4999
Academic Unit/Department: Education and Language Studies > Education
Education and Language Studies
Interdisciplinary Research Centre: Centre for Research in Education and Educational Technology (CREET)
Education Futures
Item ID: 29225
Depositing User: Gwyneth Owen-Jackson
Date Deposited: 09 Aug 2011 09:29
Last Modified: 18 Jan 2016 10:40
Share this page:

Available Versions of this Item


Scopus Citations

Download history for this item

These details should be considered as only a guide to the number of downloads performed manually. Algorithmic methods have been applied in an attempt to remove automated downloads from the displayed statistics but no guarantee can be made as to the accuracy of the figures.

▼ Automated document suggestions from open access sources

Actions (login may be required)

Policies | Disclaimer

© The Open University   + 44 (0)870 333 4340