Pinkney, Sharon and Saraga, Esther
PDF (Accepted Manuscript)
- Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
|Google Scholar:||Look up in Google Scholar|
At the centre of this book is an emphasis on the very different ways in which the concept of community is understood. In the previous chapters in this book we have seen discussions of communities as inclusionary sites of belonging and attachment and social order; as exclusionary sites of conflict and boundary and disorder; as sites in which ‘problem populations and places’ are identified; as sites of social well– being and trust and communities as the focus of social policy interventions. It is clear from these discussions that community is both contested and contradictory. In this chapter we too will examine the ways in which community rejects any single or settled meaning. The chapter will develop the argument that community is an ‘unruly’ concept as it considers the ways in which people enact community. What we mean by this is that we are interested in the ways in which people use the idea, or their sense of community as a basis of practices and actions. These practices and actions vary – they may be mundane and everyday or they may arise from specific sets of concerns, events or situations.
|Item Type:||Book Chapter|
|Copyright Holders:||2009 The Open University|
|Extra Information:||This publication forms part of the Open University course Welfare, crime and society (DD208)|
|Academic Unit/Department:||Social Sciences > Social Policy and Criminology
|Interdisciplinary Research Centre:||Centre for Citizenship, Identities and Governance (CCIG)|
|Depositing User:||Sharon Pinkney|
|Date Deposited:||03 Aug 2011 08:54|
|Last Modified:||24 Feb 2016 18:03|
|Share this page:|
Download history for this item
These details should be considered as only a guide to the number of downloads performed manually. Algorithmic methods have been applied in an attempt to remove automated downloads from the displayed statistics but no guarantee can be made as to the accuracy of the figures.