The Open UniversitySkip to content

"There is no first reading": (re)-reading nineteenth-century realist novels and their critics

Walder, Dennis (2011). "There is no first reading": (re)-reading nineteenth-century realist novels and their critics. Synthesis, 3 pp. 55–68.

Google Scholar: Look up in Google Scholar


We all read with the knowledge, or at least the memory, of what we have already read. And even the novels we read are imbued with their predecessors to such an extent that reading a novel means in effect reading its predecessors as well. Kate Atkinson’s Behind the Scenes at the Museum echoes earlier novels in the realist tradition, showing that such novels are written with other novels in mind. As Barthes put it, “there is no first reading.” According to Barthes, the common view that there is some pristine first reading of a book is as fictional as other popular cultural myths. The idea of a first, or single, reading is a pretence fostered by “the commercial and ideological habits of our society.” Every reading, even a so-called “first reading” is to some extent conditioned by other reading. Using Edward Said’s Beginnings, I look at how this is to some extent also true of critics of realist fiction, who echo and complicate each other's readings.

Item Type: Journal Item
Copyright Holders: 2011 Synthesis
ISSN: 1791-5155
Keywords: realism,reading; re-reading; nineteenth-century novels; modern fiction criticism; roland barthes
Academic Unit/School: Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences (FASS) > Arts and Cultures
Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences (FASS)
Research Group: History of Books and Reading (HOBAR)
Item ID: 29033
Depositing User: Dennis Walder
Date Deposited: 07 Jul 2011 14:00
Last Modified: 09 Feb 2018 10:46
Share this page:

Actions (login may be required)

Policies | Disclaimer

© The Open University   contact the OU