Greenfield, S.; Bernard, M.; Burgess, C.; Edwards, D.; Hill, S. J.; Jarvis, K. E.; Lord, G.; Sargent, M.; Potts, P. J.; Price, J.; West, M. and Newman, E. J.
Due to copyright restrictions, this file is not available for public download
|DOI (Digital Object Identifier) Link:||https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-008-0358-x|
|Google Scholar:||Look up in Google Scholar|
The reports of this series tabulate a number of features of analytical instruments that should be considered when making comparison between various systems. Scoring these features in a rational manner allows a scientific comparison to be made between instruments as an aid to selection. This is the XXIII report of the series and deals with instrumentation for portable X-ray fluorescence spectrometry.
|Item Type:||Journal Article|
|Copyright Holders:||2008 Royal Society of Chemistry|
|Extra Information:||The Analytical Methods Committee received and approved this report from the Instrumental Criteria Sub-Committee, whose membership is listed above.|
|Keywords:||instrumentation; overview; evaluation; X-ray fluorescence spectrometry|
|Academic Unit/Department:||Faculty of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) > Environment, Earth and Ecosystem Sciences
Faculty of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM)
|Interdisciplinary Research Centre:||Centre for Earth, Planetary, Space and Astronomical Research (CEPSAR)|
|Depositing User:||Astrid Peterkin|
|Date Deposited:||06 Apr 2011 15:26|
|Last Modified:||05 Oct 2016 07:56|
|Share this page:|