Evaluation of analytical instrumentation. Part XXIII. Instrumentation portable X-ray fluorescence spectrometry

Greenfield, S.; Bernard, M.; Burgess, C.; Edwards, D.; Hill, S. J.; Jarvis, K. E.; Lord, G.; Sargent, M.; Potts, P. J.; Price, J.; West, M. and Newman, E. J. (2008). Evaluation of analytical instrumentation. Part XXIII. Instrumentation portable X-ray fluorescence spectrometry. Accreditation and Quality Assurance: Journal for Quality, Comparability and Reliability in Chemical Measurement, 13(8), pp. 453–464.

Full text available as:

Due to copyright restrictions, this file is not available for public download

DOI (Digital Object Identifier) Link:	http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1007/s00769-008-0358-x
Google Scholar:	Look up in Google Scholar

Abstract

The reports of this series tabulate a number of features of analytical instruments that should be considered when making comparison between various systems. Scoring these features in a rational manner allows a scientific comparison to be made between instruments as an aid to selection. This is the XXIII report of the series and deals with instrumentation for portable X-ray fluorescence spectrometry.

Item Type:	Journal Article
Copyright Holders:	2008 Royal Society of Chemistry
ISSN:	1432-0517
Extra Information:	The Analytical Methods Committee received and approved this report from the Instrumental Criteria Sub-Committee, whose membership is listed above.
Keywords:	instrumentation; overview; evaluation; X-ray fluorescence spectrometry
Academic Unit/Department:	Science > Environment, Earth and Ecosystems
Interdisciplinary Research Centre:	Centre for Earth, Planetary, Space and Astronomical Research (CEPSAR)
Item ID:	28251
Depositing User:	Astrid Peterkin
Date Deposited:	06 Apr 2011 15:26
Last Modified:	25 Oct 2012 09:59
URI:	http://oro.open.ac.uk/id/eprint/28251

Actions (login may be required)

	View Item
	Public: Report issue / request change

Policies | Disclaimer