Copy the page URI to the clipboard
Earle, Sarah
(2003).
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-5395(03)00054-2
Abstract
The primacy of women’s physical appearance in the modern Western world is well documented within the literature but it is assumed that this is no longer significant during pregnancy. In this paper, I will argue that this supposition is based on scant empirical evidence and suggest that the reverse may be true. This paper is based on a qualitative research study which draws on 40 in-depth interviews with 19 pregnant women in the West Midlands, UK. It explores their perceptions of fatness, weight and body shape during pregnancy and explores the extent to which their concerns reflect either a resistance to the asexualisation of the pregnant body or the continued oppression of women’s embodiment. The paper concludes by arguing that pregnant women adopt a pragmatic approach of both selective resistance to asexualisation and selective compliance with the pressure to be slim.
Viewing alternatives
Metrics
Public Attention
Altmetrics from AltmetricNumber of Citations
Citations from DimensionsItem Actions
Export
About
- Item ORO ID
- 2795
- Item Type
- Journal Item
- ISSN
- 0277-5395
- Keywords
- reproduction; women's health; fatness; pregnancy; the body; sociology
- Academic Unit or School
-
Faculty of Wellbeing, Education and Language Studies (WELS) > Health, Wellbeing and Social Care
Faculty of Wellbeing, Education and Language Studies (WELS) - Copyright Holders
- © 2003 Elsevier Science Ltd
- Depositing User
- Sarah Earle