Reasoning, argumentation, and cognition.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 34(2) pp. 79–80.
This commentary does three things. First, it offers further support for the view that explicit reasoning evolved for public argumentation. Second, it suggests that promoting effective communication may not be the only, or even the main, function of public argumentation. Third, it argues that the data Mercier and Sperber (M&S) cite are compatible with the view that reasoning has subsequently been co-opted to play a role in individual cognition.
||2011 Cambridge University Press
||Commentary on Hugo Mercier and Dan Sperber, 'Why do humans reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory'
||Arts > Philosophy
||30 Mar 2011 14:57
||28 Jan 2014 13:28
|Share this page:
Actions (login may be required)