The Open UniversitySkip to content
 

Reasoning, argumentation, and cognition

Frankish, Keith (2011). Reasoning, argumentation, and cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 34(2) pp. 79–80.

DOI (Digital Object Identifier) Link: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X10002979
Google Scholar: Look up in Google Scholar

Abstract

This commentary does three things. First, it offers further support for the view that explicit reasoning evolved for public argumentation. Second, it suggests that promoting effective communication may not be the only, or even the main, function of public argumentation. Third, it argues that the data Mercier and Sperber (M&S) cite are compatible with the view that reasoning has subsequently been co-opted to play a role in individual cognition.

Item Type: Journal Article
Copyright Holders: 2011 Cambridge University Press
ISSN: 1469-1825
Extra Information: Commentary on Hugo Mercier and Dan Sperber, 'Why do humans reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory'
Academic Unit/Department: Arts > Philosophy
Item ID: 27794
Depositing User: Keith Frankish
Date Deposited: 30 Mar 2011 14:57
Last Modified: 28 Jan 2014 13:28
URI: http://oro.open.ac.uk/id/eprint/27794
Share this page:

Actions (login may be required)

View Item
Report issue / request change

Policies | Disclaimer

© The Open University   + 44 (0)870 333 4340   general-enquiries@open.ac.uk