Sentence realization again: reply to Rey

Barber, Alex (2008). Sentence realization again: reply to Rey. Croatian Journal of Philosophy, 8(23) pp. 233–240.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/croatjphil20088214

URL: https://www.pdcnet.org/croatjphil/content/croatjph...

Abstract

Against criticism from Georges Rey I defend both my earlier account of sentence realization and my objection to his own ‘folie-à-deux’ account. The latter has two components, one sceptical (sentences and other standard linguistic entities are rarely if ever realized [‘produced’, ‘tokened’, ‘uttered’]) and the other optimistic (this is a benign outcome since communication is unaffected by our being mistaken in assuming that they are realized). Both components are flawed, notwithstanding Rey’s defence. My non-sceptical account of sentence realization avoids the difficulties his faces, as well as those he raises for it.

Viewing alternatives

Metrics

Item Actions

Export

You can export this page using these formats Digital Object Identifier - DOI

About

• Item ORO ID
• 27017
• Item Type
• Journal Item
• ISSN
• 1333-1108
• Extra Information
• This item replies to some criticisms of Barber, A. (2006) ‘Testimony and illusion’, Croatian Journal of Philosophy, 6(18): 401-29, found in Rey, G. 'In defense of folieism', Croatian Journal of Philosophy, 8(23): 177-202.
• Keywords
• sentence realization; SLEs; philosophy of linguistics; folieism; no false lemmas
• Academic Unit or School
• Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences (FASS) > Social Sciences and Global Studies > Philosophy
  Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences (FASS) > Social Sciences and Global Studies
  Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences (FASS)
• Copyright Holders
• © 2008 KruZak
• Depositing User
• Alex Barber