The Open UniversitySkip to content

Sentence realization again: reply to Rey

Barber, Alex (2008). Sentence realization again: reply to Rey. Croatian Journal of Philosophy, 8(23) pp. 233–240.

Full text available as:
Full text not publicly available (Accepted Manuscript)
Due to publisher licensing restrictions, this file is not available for public download
Google Scholar: Look up in Google Scholar


Against criticism from Georges Rey I defend both my earlier account of sentence realization and my objection to his own ‘folie-à-deux’ account. The latter has two components, one sceptical (sentences and other standard linguistic entities are rarely if ever realized [‘produced’, ‘tokened’, ‘uttered’]) and the other optimistic (this is a benign outcome since communication is unaffected by our being mistaken in assuming that they are realized). Both components are flawed, notwithstanding Rey’s defence. My non-sceptical account of sentence realization avoids the difficulties his faces, as well as those he raises for it.

Item Type: Journal Item
Copyright Holders: 2008 KruZak
ISSN: 1333-1108
Extra Information: This item replies to some criticisms of Barber, A. (2006) ‘Testimony and illusion’, Croatian Journal of Philosophy, 6(18): 401-29, found in Rey, G. 'In defense of folieism', Croatian Journal of Philosophy, 8(23): 177-202.
Keywords: sentence realization; SLEs; philosophy of linguistics; folieism; no false lemmas
Academic Unit/School: Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences (FASS) > Social Sciences and Global Studies > Philosophy
Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences (FASS) > Social Sciences and Global Studies
Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences (FASS)
Related URLs:
Item ID: 27017
Depositing User: Alexander Barber
Date Deposited: 24 Jan 2011 14:11
Last Modified: 06 Aug 2019 10:01
Share this page:

Actions (login may be required)

Policies | Disclaimer

© The Open University   contact the OU