The Open UniversitySkip to content

Artificial functions and the meaning of literary works

Price, Carolyn (2003). Artificial functions and the meaning of literary works. Astronomy & Geophysics, 43(1) pp. 1–17.

DOI (Digital Object Identifier) Link:
Google Scholar: Look up in Google Scholar


It has been suggested that we might treat the meaning of literary works as a matter of their function. In this paper I investigate what such an account might look like, given a defensible theory of artificial functions. I consider two teleological accounts of work meaning: one that takes the meaning of a literary work to be determined by its design function and one that takes meaning to depend on use function. It might be thought that an account centring on design functions would be a robustly intentionalist account; in contrast, I argue that such an account would take authors' intentions to be one factor among others determining the meaning of literary works. An account centring on use functions will be a robustly anti-intentionalist account; but I argue that it is a less attractive version of the account, because it cannot distinguish between a reasonable and an unreasonable reading of a literary work.

Item Type: Journal Item
Copyright Holders: 2003 Royal Astronomical Society
ISSN: 1468-4004
Keywords: philosophy; aesthetics; meaning; functions; literature; intention
Academic Unit/School: Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences (FASS) > Politics, Philosophy, Economics, Development, Geography
Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences (FASS)
Item ID: 2623
Depositing User: Carolyn Price
Date Deposited: 14 Jun 2006
Last Modified: 29 Nov 2016 15:39
Share this page:


Altmetrics from Altmetric

Citations from Dimensions

Actions (login may be required)

Policies | Disclaimer

© The Open University   contact the OU