The Open UniversitySkip to content
 

Artificial functions and the meaning of literary works

Price, Carolyn (2003). Artificial functions and the meaning of literary works. Astronomy and Geophysics, 43(1) pp. 1–17.

DOI (Digital Object Identifier) Link: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjaesthetics/43.1.1
Google Scholar: Look up in Google Scholar

Abstract

It has been suggested that we might treat the meaning of literary works as a matter of their function. In this paper I investigate what such an account might look like, given a defensible theory of artificial functions. I consider two teleological accounts of work meaning: one that takes the meaning of a literary work to be determined by its design function and one that takes meaning to depend on use function. It might be thought that an account centring on design functions would be a robustly intentionalist account; in contrast, I argue that such an account would take authors' intentions to be one factor among others determining the meaning of literary works. An account centring on use functions will be a robustly anti-intentionalist account; but I argue that it is a less attractive version of the account, because it cannot distinguish between a reasonable and an unreasonable reading of a literary work.

Item Type: Journal Article
ISSN: 1468-2842
Keywords: Philosophy; aesthetics; meaning; functions; literature; intention
Academic Unit/Department: Arts > Philosophy
Item ID: 2623
Depositing User: Carolyn Price
Date Deposited: 14 Jun 2006
Last Modified: 28 Jan 2014 13:51
URI: http://oro.open.ac.uk/id/eprint/2623
Share this page:

Altmetrics

Scopus Citations

Actions (login may be required)

View Item
Report issue / request change

Policies | Disclaimer

© The Open University   + 44 (0)870 333 4340   general-enquiries@open.ac.uk