The Open UniversitySkip to content

Arguing satisfaction of security requirements

Haley, Charles B.; Laney, Robin; Moffett, Jonathan D. and Nuseibeh, Bashar (2006). Arguing satisfaction of security requirements. In: Mouratidis, Haralambos and Giorgini, Paolo eds. Integrating security and software engineering: advances and future vision. Hershey, PA and London: Idea Group Publishing, pp. 15–42.

Full text available as:
PDF (Not Set) - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
Download (449Kb)
Google Scholar: Look up in Google Scholar


This chapter presents a process for security requirements elicitation and analysis,
based around the construction of a satisfaction argument for the security of a
system. The process starts with the enumeration of security goals based on assets
in the system, then uses these goals to derive security requirements in the form of
constraints. Next, a satisfaction argument for the system is constructed, using a
problem-centered representation, a formal proof to analyze properties that can be
demonstrated, and structured informal argumentation of the assumptions exposed
during construction of the argument. Constructing the satisfaction argument can
expose missing and inconsistent assumptions about system context and behavior
that effect security, and a completed argument provides assurances that a system
can respect its security requirements.

Item Type: Book Chapter
ISBN: 1-59904-147-2, 978-1-59904-147-6
Academic Unit/Department: Mathematics, Computing and Technology > Computing & Communications
Interdisciplinary Research Centre: Centre for Research in Computing (CRC)
Item ID: 2493
Depositing User: Charles Haley
Date Deposited: 21 Jun 2006
Last Modified: 06 Dec 2010 17:28
Share this page:

Actions (login may be required)

Policies | Disclaimer

© The Open University   + 44 (0)870 333 4340