Chambers, Peter; Cooper, Alan; Norton, Andrew; Rix, Andrew; Stewart, Malcolm and Tanner, John D.
Due to copyright restrictions, this file is not available for public download
|Google Scholar:||Look up in Google Scholar|
The purpose of this report is to compare the accuracies of five different techniques for determining contact times. Recordings and measurements of the transit were taken through four instruments, the Open University's Meade LX200 for accurate timing of the third contact, and a Meade ETX 105 for coverage of the whole transit. Both were recorded on digital videotape. In addition, images were recorded on a webcam on a 100mm telescope and visual estimates were made with an ETX125. Analysis of the LX200 tapes gave an accuracy of ±5 seconds for the time of contact. Methods are compared in the Conclusions. Several other telescopes were used on campus for public displays of the event. There was minimal black drop.
|Item Type:||Journal Article|
|Copyright Holders:||2005 British Astronomical Association|
|Academic Unit/School:||Faculty of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) > Physical Sciences
Faculty of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM)
|Interdisciplinary Research Centre:||Centre for Earth, Planetary, Space and Astronomical Research (CEPSAR)|
|Depositing User:||Andrew Norton|
|Date Deposited:||31 Mar 2011 09:28|
|Last Modified:||29 Nov 2016 20:52|
|Share this page:|