The Open UniversitySkip to content
 

“A logos that increases itself”: response to Burley

Chappell, Timothy (2010). “A logos that increases itself”: response to Burley. Philosophy, 85(1) pp. 105–108.

Full text available as:
[img]
Preview
PDF (Version of Record) - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
Download (54Kb)
DOI (Digital Object Identifier) Link: http://doi.org/10.1017/S0031819109990477
Google Scholar: Look up in Google Scholar

Abstract

[Opening] Mikel Burley says that he thinks that the Makropoulos debate can make no sense unless talk about eternal life makes sense. Here is his most striking argument that it doesn't – that immortality is inconceivable: "...the concepts [of birth, death, and sexual relations] are internally related to the concept of a human being in the sense that they form part of the complex system of interrelated concepts of which 'human being' is a member. To understand what a human being is, and hence to be able to operate competently with that concept, one must also have some understanding of, among many other things, what it means for a human being to be born, to form sexual relationships, and to die." (Burley, 'Immortality and meaning: reflections on the Makropoulos debate', Philosophy 84, 543–5). Here, at first sight, Burley appears to be making no more than some unsurprising true generic claims about humans – that they get born, that they have sex, that they die. Yet from these unsurprising generic claims, Burley apparently infers a very surprising semantic claim: that it would be a grammatical mistake, a piece of nonsense, to speak of particular humans who didn–t die, or who in some way or other lived after their deaths. This inference is simply a non sequitur, just as it would be a non sequitur to infer from the generic premise that sex is part of human life to the semantic conclusion that it is nonsensical to suggest that a particular human might be celibate.

Item Type: Journal Article
Copyright Holders: 2010 The Royal Institute of Philosophy
ISSN: 0031-8191
Academic Unit/Department: Arts > Philosophy
Arts
Item ID: 24587
Depositing User: Sophie Grace Chappell
Date Deposited: 09 Nov 2010 12:46
Last Modified: 25 Feb 2016 10:55
URI: http://oro.open.ac.uk/id/eprint/24587
Share this page:

Altmetrics

Scopus Citations

► Automated document suggestions from open access sources

Download history for this item

These details should be considered as only a guide to the number of downloads performed manually. Algorithmic methods have been applied in an attempt to remove automated downloads from the displayed statistics but no guarantee can be made as to the accuracy of the figures.

Actions (login may be required)

Policies | Disclaimer

© The Open University   + 44 (0)870 333 4340   general-enquiries@open.ac.uk