Frowd, Charlie D.; Bruce, Vicki; Ness, Hayley; Bowie, Leslie; Paterson, Jenny; Thomson-Bogner, Claire; McIntyre, Alex and Hancock, Peter J. B.
(2007).
| DOI (Digital Object Identifier) Link: | https://doi.org/10.1080/00140130601154855 |
|---|---|
| Google Scholar: | Look up in Google Scholar |
Abstract
This paper examines two facial composite systems that present multiple faces during construction to more closely resemble natural face processing. A �parallel� version of PRO-fit was evaluated, which presents facial features in sets of six or twelve, and EvoFIT, a system in development, which contains a holistic face model and an evolutionary interface. The PRO-fit parallel interface turned out not to be quite as good as the �serial� version as it appeared to interfere with holistic face processing. Composites from EvoFIT were named almost three times better than PRO-fit, but a benefit emerged under feature encoding, suggesting that recall has a greater role for EvoFIT than was previously thought. In general, an advantage was found for feature encoding, replicating a previous finding in this area, and also for a novel�holistic� interview.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Copyright Holders: | 2007 Taylor & Francis |
| ISSN: | 1366-5847 |
| Keywords: | facial composites; witness; holistic; parallel presentation |
| Academic Unit/School: | Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences (FASS) > Psychology Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences (FASS) |
| Interdisciplinary Research Centre: | Harm and Evidence Research Collaborative (HERC) Centre for Policing Research and Learning (CPRL) |
| Item ID: | 24564 |
| Depositing User: | Hayley Ness |
| Date Deposited: | 17 Feb 2011 10:50 |
| Last Modified: | 04 Oct 2016 10:49 |
| URI: | http://oro.open.ac.uk/id/eprint/24564 |
| Share this page: |     |
Altmetrics | Scopus Citations |