Copy the page URI to the clipboard
Wetherell, Margaret
(1999).
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354399093009
Abstract
It is argued that Marxism is most useful for radical psychology in negative terms-as a form of critique. It has much less to offer as a positive theoretical programme. The binaries which make up Marxist epistemology (individual-social, culture-economy, base-superstructure, truth-falsity, real-illusory) constrain creative thought and lead to some by now predictable cul-de-sac. The Foucauldian emphasis on studying onto-formative practices is more useful. This claim is illustrated through a critical examination of Foster's construction of the discursive and extra-discursive, Osterkamp's premises regarding human nature, and the view of false consciousness developed by Augoustinos.
Viewing alternatives
Metrics
Public Attention
Altmetrics from AltmetricNumber of Citations
Citations from Dimensions- Published Version (PDF) This file is not available for public download
Item Actions
Export
About
- Item ORO ID
- 24350
- Item Type
- Journal Item
- ISSN
- 1461-7447
- Keywords
- ideology; Marxism; post-structuralism; racism; realism; subjectivity
- Academic Unit or School
-
Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences (FASS) > Psychology and Counselling > Psychology
Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences (FASS) > Psychology and Counselling
Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences (FASS) - Copyright Holders
- © 1999 Sage Publications
- Depositing User
- Margaret Wetherell