PDF (Accepted Manuscript)
- Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
|Google Scholar:||Look up in Google Scholar|
Several times in the BBC's history, from 1928 to around 1963, the world of professional science has attempted to influence, and even control, the BBC's practices regarding science coverage. The main scientific lobbyists of the BBC were the Royal Society, the British Association for the Advancement of Science, and the Department of Scientific and Industrial Research, together with less prominent individuals and organisations. The proposals made by these bodies and individuals were consistent over several decades and from organisation to organisation, and involved the institutional world of science being given more control over the BBC's science output. These proposals (which were unsuccessful) were a threat to the BBC's autonomy.
The paper examines the background of these scientific interventions and the BBC's constitutional status as an autonomous organisation. It finds that there was a high degree of symmetry between the BBC's role as a public service broadcaster and the scientists' roles as disseminators of scientific knowledge.
The paper concludes by framing the scientists' interventions, and the BBC's response, in the light of scholarship relating to the construction of social structure through social interaction.
|Item Type:||Conference Item|
|Copyright Holders:||2008 Allan Jones|
|Keywords:||BBC; science broadcasting; J.G. Crowther|
|Academic Unit/Department:||Faculty of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) > Computing and Communications
Faculty of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM)
|Depositing User:||Allan Jones|
|Date Deposited:||22 Nov 2010 09:35|
|Last Modified:||05 Oct 2016 08:06|
|Share this page:|
Download history for this item
These details should be considered as only a guide to the number of downloads performed manually. Algorithmic methods have been applied in an attempt to remove automated downloads from the displayed statistics but no guarantee can be made as to the accuracy of the figures.