PDF (Version of Record)
- Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
|Google Scholar:||Look up in Google Scholar|
I have chosen a provocative thesis to consider at the culmination of the K2 programme based on the argument that much of the research work we are engaged in today is a strong echo of the work that we were engaged in a decade ago.
That is, not “genuinely” innovative.
The argument suggests that we are recreating and reinforcing our existing learning models and missing the opportunity to change and improve how our students learn.
Regardless of where you stand in such a debate, the argument at least provides you with the opportunity to assess the potential for change offered by new technologies and to look for examples that refute it – genuinely innovative case studies that can come out of the laboratory and be robustly applied. The examples we can find help us to frame the key research and design challenges for the ‘technology’ in TEL. Also they oblige us to honestly assess how we know if our R&D effort is making a difference?
|Item Type:||Conference Item|
|Copyright Holders:||2004 The Author|
|Extra Information:||Listed in the programme as:
e-learning and technologies - the future today
|Academic Unit/Department:||Knowledge Media Institute|
|Interdisciplinary Research Centre:||Centre for Research in Computing (CRC)
Centre for Research in Education and Educational Technology (CREET)
|Depositing User:||Kay Dave|
|Date Deposited:||11 Aug 2011 10:25|
|Last Modified:||24 Mar 2016 16:56|
|Share this page:|
► Automated document suggestions from open access sources
Download history for this item
These details should be considered as only a guide to the number of downloads performed manually. Algorithmic methods have been applied in an attempt to remove automated downloads from the displayed statistics but no guarantee can be made that they have all been cleansed.