PDF (Accepted Manuscript)
- Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
|Google Scholar:||Look up in Google Scholar|
British banks in the 1950s were conservative, restrained and non-competitive. They were also early adopters of large-scale electronic computing technology. In contrast to their behaviour in business, their appropriation of this technology was ambitious, competitive and prone to excess. Between 1961 and 1963 the banks saw the computer as a status symbol as they deliberately constructed their first computer centres as sites for public display. Emphasising the materiality of the computer enhanced by its material setting was nothing new – IBM had done this in 1948 with its SSEC at its Manhattan headquarters – but what was interesting about the British banks was the way they in which they did this whilst at the same time upholding 400 years of tradition.
The spatial demands of the computer had required a dislocation of customer accounting from branch to computer centre that was an opportunity for the banks to generate some publicity and differentiate their offerings. A number of 'performances' were held in the West End of London for invited guests, and one went as far as claiming that its computer was at the heart of the 'most advanced bank book-keeping system in the world'. The computer and its peripherals were colour coded to help explain functions and their operators were shown working in an environment of clinical efficiency. Where technologies were immaterial or opaque, for instance the computer's programs or customer account details stored on magnetic tape, they were made visible by drawing attention to their modern qualities such as speed, capacity, accuracy and size.
The banks' computer centre modernity was a world away from the 'discreet modernism' coined by Jon Agar to describe the British government's use of computing technology at the same time. By combining visual, oral and written sources, I explore elements of bank computer centre design and the sociomaterial ensembles within to show how the centres were presented as homes for a computer-led orchestration of modern technologies and modern work whilst important notions of tradition were upheld in the branch. Considering the relationship between materiality, modernity and space, I suggest that the banks' computer centre modernity was a conspicuous modernism in which the spaces of the computer centre and the branch were like the two faces of Janus, looking forwards and backwards at the same time. At the computer centre one looked firmly towards the future, while in the branch the other looked cautiously behind.
|Item Type:||Conference Item|
|Copyright Holders:||2010 Ian Martin|
|Extra Information:||Workshop held at and supported by the Society for the History of Technology Annual Meeting, 30 Sep - 03 Oct 2010, Tacoma, USA.|
|Academic Unit/Department:||Mathematics, Computing and Technology > Computing & Communications
Mathematics, Computing and Technology
|Depositing User:||Ian Martin|
|Date Deposited:||08 Oct 2010 14:33|
|Last Modified:||16 Jan 2016 10:30|
|Share this page:|