Due to copyright restrictions, this file is not available for public download
Click here to request a copy from the OU Author.
|DOI (Digital Object Identifier) Link:||https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-10871-6_5|
|Google Scholar:||Look up in Google Scholar|
Understanding which ontology characteristics can predict a "good" quality ontology, is a core and ongoing task in the Semantic Web. In this paper, we provide our findings on which structural ontology characteristics are usually observed in high-quality ontologies. We obtain these findings through a task-based evaluation, where the task is the assessment of the correctness of semantic relations. This task is of increasing importance for a set of novel Semantic Web tools, which perform fine-grained knowledge reuse (i.e., they reuse only appropriate parts of a given ontology instead of the entire ontology). We conclude that, while structural ontology characteristics do not provide statistically significant information to ensure that an ontology is reliable ("good"), in general, richly populated ontologies, with higher depth and breadth variance are more likely to provide reliable semantic content.
|Item Type:||Conference Item|
|Copyright Holders:||2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg|
|Keywords:||semantic relations; knowledge reuse; Semantic Web|
|Academic Unit/Department:||Faculty of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) > Knowledge Media Institute (KMi)
Faculty of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM)
|Interdisciplinary Research Centre:||Centre for Research in Computing (CRC)
Centre for Policing Research and Learning (CPRL)
|Depositing User:||Kay Dave|
|Date Deposited:||14 Oct 2010 11:51|
|Last Modified:||18 Nov 2016 17:06|
|Share this page:|