Mamou-Mani, Adrien; Sharp, David; Meurisse, Thibaut and Ring, William
PDF (Version of Record)
- Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
|Google Scholar:||Look up in Google Scholar|
For large-scale musical instrument makers, the ability to produce instruments with exactly the same playing characteristics is a constant aim. Modern acoustical measurement techniques (such as acoustic pulse reflectometry and input impedance measurement methods) together with psychoacoustical testing, can help this goal be reached. This paper investigates the issue of instrument manufacturing consistency by comparing the acoustical properties and the perceptual qualities of five Howarth S10 student oboes. Input impedance measurements have been made on the five oboes for fingerings throughout the standard playing range of the instrument, acoustic pulse reflectometry has been used to measure the bore profiles of the oboes, and nine musicians have taken part in a two-alternative-forced-choice discrimination playing test using two of the instruments. The main findings are (i) the instruments are perceived as identical by most of the musicians tested, (ii) a variation in the playability of the note F6 experienced by two of the musicians is shown to be due to differences in the elevation of the pad above the C hole, and (iii) some small variations in the playing properties in the first register of the instruments are shown to be related to differences in input impedance which, in turn, appear to arise from small differences in the bore profiles of the instruments.
|Item Type:||Conference Item|
|Copyright Holders:||2010 The Authors|
|Academic Unit/Department:||Faculty of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) > Engineering and Innovation
Faculty of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM)
|Depositing User:||David Sharp|
|Date Deposited:||24 Sep 2010 13:36|
|Last Modified:||06 Oct 2016 01:58|
|Share this page:|
Download history for this item
These details should be considered as only a guide to the number of downloads performed manually. Algorithmic methods have been applied in an attempt to remove automated downloads from the displayed statistics but no guarantee can be made as to the accuracy of the figures.