Copy the page URI to the clipboard
Marshall, Paul; Cheng, Peter C-H. and Luckin, Rosemary
(2010).
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/1709886.1709914
Abstract
An assumption behind much work on the use of tangibles for learning is that there are benefits related to the physical manipulation of materials. However, previous work that has shown learning benefits of using physical materials often hasn’t adequately controlled for the covariates of physicality.
In this paper, we describe a study where we compared the effects on adults’ discovery learning on a balance beam task of using either physical or graphical materials and with either control or no control over the design of experiments. No effects were found of either the type of learning material or the level of control over the experimental design.
Viewing alternatives
Metrics
Public Attention
Altmetrics from AltmetricNumber of Citations
Citations from DimensionsItem Actions
Export
About
- Item ORO ID
- 22664
- Item Type
- Conference or Workshop Item
- ISBN
- 1-60558-841-5, 978-1-60558-841-4
- Project Funding Details
-
Funded Project Name Project ID Funding Body Not Set Not Set ACM New York, NY, USA - Keywords
- tangibles; physical; graphical; balance beam task
- Academic Unit or School
- Faculty of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM)
- Research Group
- Centre for Research in Computing (CRC)
- Copyright Holders
- © 2010 ACM
- Depositing User
- Paul Marshall